What is Conservatism? [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In Objects: Nothing Out of the Ordinary, Daniel Z. Korman defends a view he calls conservatism. Conservatives hold that there are ordinary objects, but no extraordinary objects. But Korman never explicitly characterizes what would qualify an object as ordinary in the relevant sense. We have some paradigm cases of ordinary objects, including tables, dogs, and trees; and we have some paradigm cases of extraordinary objects of sorts familiar from the philosophical literature. Here I attempt to fill this gap, surveying a number of attempts to characterize the commitments of conservatism. All fail. In particular, no specification of what it takes for an object to be ordinary is both plausible and consistent with the conservative verdicts on the paradigms. I argue that this is no coincidence, since it turns out to be implausible in light of the results of settled science to deny the existence of one of Korman's paradigms of an extraordinary object. The upshot is that plausibility requires being a little more liberal than conservatism seems to allow.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-01-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Right Stuff.Ned Markosian - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):665-687.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
62 ( #30,033 of 40,675 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #18,199 of 40,675 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.