Locke's Criterion for the Reality of Ideas: Unambiguous but Untenable

The Locke Newsletter 28:29-50 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper argues against the claim held, e.g., by Leibniz, that Locke employs a double standard for determining whether an object before the mind (i.e., an idea) is real. Using Locke's ectype-archetype distinction it is shown that this charge is the result of confusing Locke's criterion of reality with its application. Depending on whether it applies to a simple, substance or mode idea, the criterion works out differently. Next it is argued that although Locke maintains only a single criterion, this criterion is untenable, since it fails to properly distinguish real from fantastical ideas.

Author's Profile

Cornelis de Waal
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-06

Downloads
738 (#26,456)

6 months
102 (#52,884)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?