¿Debe el matrimonio igualitario ser la meta de un movimiento progresista?

Cruce 2019 (S1):41-48 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
SPANISH: Las parejas del mismo sexo tienen razón cuando dicen que negarles el matrimonio es discriminar contra ellas; pero otorgar el matrimonio a las parejas del mismo sexo sin dar a familias no conyugales los beneficios que el matrimonio provee remediaría la injusticia hacia las primeras sin subsanar la iniquidad hacia las segundas. Crear una sociedad que favorece solo una opción para reconocer las relaciones de serio compromiso no debe ser la meta de un movimiento progresista. ENGLISH: Same-sex couples are right when they say that denying them marriage is discriminating against them; but granting marriage to same-sex couples without giving non-marital families the benefits marriage provides would remedy the injustice towards the former without correcting the iniquity towards the latter. Creating a society that favors only one option to recognize committed relationships should not be the goal of a progressive movement.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIADEM
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-10-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-10-09

Total views
19 ( #42,628 of 43,857 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #30,754 of 43,857 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.