¿Debe el matrimonio igualitario ser la meta de un movimiento progresista?

Cruce 2019 (S1):41-48 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
SPANISH: Las parejas del mismo sexo tienen razón cuando dicen que negarles el matrimonio es discriminar contra ellas; pero otorgar el matrimonio a las parejas del mismo sexo sin dar a familias no conyugales los beneficios que el matrimonio provee remediaría la injusticia hacia las primeras sin subsanar la iniquidad hacia las segundas. Crear una sociedad que favorece solo una opción para reconocer las relaciones de serio compromiso no debe ser la meta de un movimiento progresista. ENGLISH: Same-sex couples are right when they say that denying them marriage is discriminating against them; but granting marriage to same-sex couples without giving non-marital families the benefits marriage provides would remedy the injustice towards the former without correcting the iniquity towards the latter. Creating a society that favors only one option to recognize committed relationships should not be the goal of a progressive movement.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIADEM
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-10-09

Total views
45 ( #46,501 of 53,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #40,846 of 53,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.