¿Debe el matrimonio igualitario ser la meta de un movimiento progresista?

Cruce 2019 (S1):41-48 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SPANISH: Las parejas del mismo sexo tienen razón cuando dicen que negarles el matrimonio es discriminar contra ellas; pero otorgar el matrimonio a las parejas del mismo sexo sin dar a familias no conyugales los beneficios que el matrimonio provee remediaría la injusticia hacia las primeras sin subsanar la iniquidad hacia las segundas. Crear una sociedad que favorece solo una opción para reconocer las relaciones de serio compromiso no debe ser la meta de un movimiento progresista. ENGLISH: Same-sex couples are right when they say that denying them marriage is discriminating against them; but granting marriage to same-sex couples without giving non-marital families the benefits marriage provides would remedy the injustice towards the former without correcting the iniquity towards the latter. Creating a society that favors only one option to recognize committed relationships should not be the goal of a progressive movement.

Author's Profile

Jesus A. Diaz
Brown University (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-09

Downloads
368 (#60,497)

6 months
109 (#49,330)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?