Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions

Ethics (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many oppose the use of profile evidence against defendants at trial, even when the statistical correlations are reliable and the jury is free from prejudice. The literature has struggled to justify this opposition. We argue that admitting profile evidence is objectionable because it violates what we call “equal protection”—that is, a right of innocent defendants not to be exposed to higher ex ante risks of mistaken conviction compared to other innocent defendants facing similar charges. We also show why admitting other forms of evidence, such as eyewitness, trace, and motive evidence, does not violate equal protection.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIBPEF
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-08-07

Total views
24 ( #38,277 of 41,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #23,264 of 41,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.