Making desires satisfied, making satisfied desires

Philosophical Studies 180 (3):979-999 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I explore a fundamental but under-appreciated distinction between two ways of understanding the desire-satisfaction theory of well-being. According to proactive desire satisfactionism, a person is benefited by the acquisition of new satisfied desires. According to reactive desire satisfactionism, a person can be benefited only by the satisfaction of their existing desires. I first offer an overview of this distinction. I then canvass several ways of developing a general formulation of desire satisfactionism that would capture the reactive view, and argue that all come with significant costs.

Author's Profile

Alexander Dietz
University of Southern California (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-29

Downloads
268 (#56,695)

6 months
147 (#20,060)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?