The Bishop and Priest: Toward a point-of-view based epistemology of true contradictions.

Logos Architekton 2 (2):35-58. (2008)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
True contradictions are taken increasingly seriously by philosophers and logicians. Yet, the belief that contradictions are always false remains deeply intuitive. This paper confronts this belief head-on by explaining in detail how one specific contradiction is true. The contradiction in question derives from Priest's reworking of Berkeley's argument for idealism. However, technical aspects of the explanation offered here differ considerably from Priest's derivation. The explanation uses novel formal and epistemological tools to guide the reader through a valid argument with, not just true, but eminently acceptable premises, to an admittedly unusual conclusion: a true contradiction. The novel formal and epistemological tools concern points of view and changes in points of view. The result is an understanding of why the contradiction is true.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIETBA
Revision history
Archival date: 2011-02-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Berkeley's Thought.Pappas, George S.
The Big Book of Concepts.Murphy, Gregory L.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-02-20

Total views
436 ( #9,433 of 48,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #25,692 of 48,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.