A representational theory of artefacts and artworks

British Journal of Aesthetics 41 (4):353-370 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The artefacts produced by artists during their creation of works of art are very various: paintings, writings, musical scores, and so on. I have a general thesis to offer about the relations of artefacts and artworks, but within the confines of this article I shall mainly discuss cases drawn from the art of painting, central specimens of which seem to be autographic in Nelson Goodman's sense, namely such that even the most exact duplication of them does not count as producing the same work of art. My view will be that an artwork (such as a painting) and its associated artefact are not identical, and nor is the artefact in any sense part of the painting in question,2 but that nevertheless it is still possible to maintain the view that paintings are autographic (which view I shall call l the autographic thesis). I shall proceed initially through presentation of some counter-examples to common assumptions as to the relations of artefacts and artworks, and then present an alternative 'representational' theory of their relations.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DILART
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-03
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
967 ( #6,218 of 71,188 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #10,290 of 71,188 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.