Epistemic Problems of Utilitarian Practical Reasoning

Proceedings of the Heraclitean Society 19 (1998-9)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Utilitarian (U.) theories must be capable of being applied in practical reasoning, or they would have no value as a guide to rational conduct. However, I show that epistemic extensions to U. theories produce logical confusion. Basic questions about what one needs to know in order to apply a U. analysis embroil one in an infinite regress. And attempts to incrementally apply U. either are no help at all (leaving one entirely 'in the dark'), or in general constitute arbitrary gambles which no practical reasoner could defend taking. These problems are serious enough to completely discredit U. theories as having any relevance to practical reasoning.

Author's Profile

John Dilworth
Western Michigan University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-12

Downloads
297 (#67,619)

6 months
100 (#64,209)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?