The Addict in Us All

Frontiers in Psychiatry 5 (139):01-20 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we contend that the psychology of addiction is similar to the psychology of ordinary, non-addictive temptation in important respects, and explore the ways in which these parallels can illuminate both addiction and ordinary action. The incentive salience account of addiction proposed by Robinson and Berridge (1993; 2001; 2008) entails that addictive desires are not in their nature different from many of the desires had by non-addicts; what is different is rather the way that addictive desires are acquired, which in turn affects their strength. We examine these “incentive salience” desires, both in addicts and non-addicts, contrasting them with more cognitive desires. On this account, the self-control challenge faced by addicted agents is not different in kind from that faced by non-addicted agents – though the two may, of course, differ greatly in degree of difficulty. We explore a general model of self-control for both the addict and the non-addict, stressing that self-control may be employed at three different stages, and examining the ways in which it might be strengthened. This helps elucidate a general model of intentional action.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DILTAI
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-10-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Adicción, enfermedad crónica y responsabilidad.Hardcastle, Valerie Gray & Hardcastle, Cheshire
Addiction, Chronic Illness, and Responsibility.Hardcastle, Valerie Gray & Hardcastle, Cheshire

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-10-10

Total downloads
225 ( #11,553 of 37,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #11,150 of 37,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.