The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artworks have at least some necessary content properties, as do abstract entities such as propositions. But no concrete item, whether an object, event, process etc., could have any necessary content property. So no artwork could be identical with a concrete item. Hence artworks must be abstract. I also argue that artworks are only contingently connected with concrete items, just as propositions are only contingently linked to their linguistic tokens.

Author's Profile

John Dilworth
Western Michigan University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-14

Downloads
555 (#26,578)

6 months
77 (#49,182)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?