Three Criteria for Environmental Authenticity: A Response to the Simulation Problem

Environmental Philosophy 18 (2):279-318 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Broadly, I endorse the view that biodiverse species and spaces warrant conservation (partially) in virtue of their power to induce epistemic (Paul 2015; Sarkar 2011), relational, and positive, psycho-physiological transformation. However, if we are (in the not-so-distant future) able to construct cross-modally replete simulations of biodiverse environments, then what reason would we have to conserve genuine, biodiverse ecosystems? In order to address this “Simulation Problem,” I argue that the authenticity of biodiverse environments matters, both in itself and insofar as authenticity plays an important psychological, cultural, personal, and epistemic role in the lives of human agents.

Author's Profile

Kimberly Dill
Santa Clara University

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-05

Downloads
94 (#102,507)

6 months
73 (#89,800)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?