Epistemic contextualism can be stated properly

Synthese 191 (15):3541-3556 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It has been argued that epistemic contextualism faces the so-called factivity problem and hence cannot be stated properly. The basic idea behind this charge is that contextualists supposedly have to say, on the one hand, that knowledge ascribing sentences like “S knows that S has hands” are true when used in ordinary contexts while, on the other hand, they are not true by the standard of their own context. In my paper, I want to show that the argument to the factivity problem fails because it rests on the mistaken premise that contextualists are committed to the truth of particular ordinary knowledge attributions
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DINECC
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-09-05
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-05-07

Total views
476 ( #13,094 of 2,448,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #20,841 of 2,448,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.