Non-indexical vs. assessment relativism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is commonly held that retraction data, if we accept them, show that assessment relativism is to be preferred over non-indexical relativism (a.k.a. non-indexical contextualism). I will argue that this is not the case. Whether retraction data have the suggested probative force depends on substantive questions about the proper treatment of tense and location. One’s preferred account in these domains should determine which form of relativism one prefers.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DINNVA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-04-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Afterthoughts.Kaplan, David
What Is Assertion.MacFarlane, John

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-04-09

Total views
142 ( #27,327 of 49,996 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #20,652 of 49,996 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.