What Is the Well-Foundedness of Grounding?

Mind 125 (498):439-468 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A number of philosophers think that grounding is, in some sense, well-founded. This thesis, however, is not always articulated precisely, nor is there a consensus in the literature as to how it should be characterized. In what follows, I consider several principles that one might have in mind when asserting that grounding is well-founded, and I argue that one of these principles, which I call ‘full foundations’, best captures the relevant claim. My argument is by the process of elimination. For each of the inadequate principles, I illustrate its inadequacy by showing either that it excludes cases that should not be ruled out by a well-foundedness axiom for grounding, or that it admits cases that should be ruled out.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIXWIT-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-03-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-03-10

Total views
743 ( #6,147 of 58,210 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #8,667 of 58,210 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.