Is progressive environmentalism an oxymoron?

Critical Review 6 (2-3):283-303 (1992)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Environmentalism has been a part of the ideological landscape of liberal societies for nearly three decades. Classical liberals have not yet succeeded, however, in articulating a coherent response that would be relevant to politically active environmentalists, as well as to liberals receptive to postmodern ideas. Robert C. Paehlke argues that, conservative liberals being in fact hostile to environmental thinking, moderate progressivism and environmentalism should enter into a close alliance. This paper challenges both assertions. Admittedly, not all currents within contemporary conservative liberalism could play a part in the development of a neoliberal environmentalist movement. One current, however, the skeptical tradition, whose origin can be traced back to the Scottish Englightenment, is remarkably well suited to this task. Progressivism, on the other hand, could end up smothering the environmental movement under the weight of its own certainties
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Inquiry and Change.Lindblom, Charles E.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Politics or Scholarship?Friedman, Jeffrey

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #37,877 of 46,319 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,629 of 46,319 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.