Introduction to Special Issue on “Enactivism, Representationalism, and Predictive Processing”

Philosophical Explorations 21 (2):179-186 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The papers in this special issue make important contributions to a longstanding debate about how we should conceive of and explain mental phenomena. In other words, they make a case about the best philosophical paradigm for cognitive science. The two main competing approaches, hotly debated for several decades, are representationalism and enactivism. However, recent developments in disciplines such as machine learning and computational neuroscience have fostered a proliferation of intermediate approaches, leading to the emergence of completely new positions, in particular the Predictive Processing approach. Here, we will consider the different approaches discussed in this volume.

Author Profiles

Luke Roelofs
New York University
Tobias Schlicht
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Krzysztof (Krys) Dolega
Ruhr-Universität Bochum (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-07-04

Downloads
96 (#56,573)

6 months
26 (#39,237)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?