Counterfactuals, Accessibility, and Comparative Similarity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Berit Brogaard and Joe Salerno (2008) have defended the validity of counterfactual hypothetical syllogism (CHS) within the Stalnaker-Lewis account. Whenever the premisses of an instance of CHS are non-vacuosly true, a shift in context has occurred. Hence the standard counterexamples to CHS suffer from context failure. Charles Cross (2011) rejects this argument as irreconcilable with the Stalnaker-Lewis account. I argue against Cross that the basic Stalnaker-Lewis truth condition may be supplemented in a way that makes (CHS) valid. Yet pace Brogaard and Salerno, there are alternative ways of spelling out the basic truth condition which are standard in most debates; and given these ways, the counterexamples to CHS are successful.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOHCAA
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-04-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-04-16

Total views
464 ( #14,027 of 64,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #47,845 of 64,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.