Fiction and Thought Experiment - A Case Study

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers are very sanguine about the cognitive contributions of fiction to science and philosophy. I focus on a case study: Ichikawa and Jarvis’s account of thought experiments in terms of everyday fictional stories. As far as the contribution of fiction is not sui generis, processing fiction often will be parasitic on cognitive capacities which may replace it; as far as it is sui generis, nothing guarantees that fiction is sufficiently well-behaved to abide by the constraints of scientific and philosophical discourse, not even by the minimum requirements of conceptual and logical coherence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOHFAT
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-06-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Williamson, Timothy
Truth in Fiction.Lewis, David K.
Mimesis as Make-Believe.Walton, Kendall L.
Narrative Explanation.Velleman, J. David

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-06-07

Total views
146 ( #26,310 of 48,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #17,897 of 48,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.