Fiction and Thought Experiment - A Case Study

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many philosophers are very sanguine about the cognitive contributions of fiction to science and philosophy. I focus on a case study: Ichikawa and Jarvis’s account of thought experiments in terms of everyday fictional stories. As far as the contribution of fiction is not sui generis, processing fiction often will be parasitic on cognitive capacities which may replace it; as far as it is sui generis, nothing guarantees that fiction is sufficiently well-behaved to abide by the constraints of scientific and philosophical discourse, not even by the minimum requirements of conceptual and logical coherence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOHFAT
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-06-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-06-07

Total views
177 ( #26,510 of 54,578 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #25,462 of 54,578 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.