Theistic and Scientific Multiverses: Conflict or Concord?

Erkenntnis (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I examine the claim that theistic and scientific multiverses conflict: the former require that only universes above a certain threshold of value exist, while the latter make no such stipulations. I explore several avenues of reconciliation: appealing to ceteris peribus conditions ostensibly inherent within scientific theories, redefining `universe' in the philosophical context, advocating skeptical theism, contending that God and gratuitous evil are compatible, and adjusting the relevant scientific theories. I conclude that only the last strategy is viable, as long as we grant the coherence of a Molinist account of divine providence. If successful, it would entail that scientific and theistic models conflict only superficially. If not, however, then the theistic multiverse is inconsistent with its scientific counterparts.

Author's Profile

Miles K. Donahue
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-04-12

Downloads
81 (#102,803)

6 months
81 (#80,450)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?