Dynamical versus structural explanations in scientific revolutions

Synthese 194 (7):2307-2327 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


By briefly reviewing three well-known scientific revolutions in fundamental physics (the discovery of inertia, of special relativity and of general relativity), I claim that problems that were supposed to be crying for a dynamical explanation in the old paradigm ended up receiving a structural explanation in the new one. This claim is meant to give more substance to Kuhn’s view that revolutions are accompanied by a shift in what needs to be explained, while suggesting at the same time the existence of a pattern that is common to all of the discussed case-studies. It remains to be seen whether also quantum mechanics, in particular entanglement, conforms to this pattern

Author's Profile

Mauro Dorato
UniversitĂ  degli Studi Roma Tre


Added to PP

640 (#25,055)

6 months
89 (#51,745)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?