Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy

Mind 128 (509):175-211 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The Lockean Thesis says that you must believe p iff you’re sufficiently confident of it. On some versions, the 'must' asserts a metaphysical connection; on others, it asserts a normative one. On some versions, 'sufficiently confident' refers to a fixed threshold of credence; on others, it varies with proposition and context. Claim: the Lockean Thesis follows from epistemic utility theory—the view that rational requirements are constrained by the norm to promote accuracy. Different versions of this theory generate different versions of Lockeanism; moreover, a plausible version of epistemic utility theory meshes with natural language considerations, yielding a new Lockean picture that helps to model and explain the role of beliefs in inquiry and conversation. Your beliefs are your best guesses in response to the epistemic priorities of your context. Upshot: we have a new approach to the epistemology and semantics of belief. And it has teeth. It implies that the role of beliefs is fundamentally different than many have thought, and in fact supports a metaphysical reduction of belief to credence.
Reprint years
2017, 2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DORLME-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-08-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge in an Uncertain World.Fantl, Jeremy & McGrath, Matthew
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 86 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Credence: A Belief-First Approach.Moon, Andrew & Jackson, Elizabeth

View all 22 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-08-01

Total views
621 ( #6,066 of 50,259 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
214 ( #1,823 of 50,259 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.