Mathematical biology and the existence of biological laws

In D. Dieks, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), Probabilities, Laws and Structure. Springer (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An influential position in the philosophy of biology claims that there are no biological laws, since any apparently biological generalization is either too accidental, fact-like or contingent to be named a law, or is simply reducible to physical laws that regulate electrical and chemical interactions taking place between merely physical systems. In the following I will stress a neglected aspect of the debate that emerges directly from the growing importance of mathematical models of biological phenomena. My main aim is to defend, as well as reinforce, the view that there are indeed laws also in biology, and that their difference in stability, contingency or resilience with respect to physical laws is one of degrees, and not of kind
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DORMBA
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-03-20
Latest version: 1 (2012-03-20)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-03-20

Total views
809 ( #5,826 of 2,432,988 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
79 ( #8,494 of 2,432,988 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.