Realism and instrumentalism about the wave function. How should we choose?

In Shao Gan (ed.), Protective Measurements and Quantum Reality: Toward a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The main claim of the paper is that one can be ‘realist’ (in some sense) about quantum mechanics without requiring any form of realism about the wave function. We begin by discussing various forms of realism about the wave function, namely Albert’s configuration-space realism, Dürr Zanghi and Goldstein’s nomological realism about Ψ, Esfeld’s dispositional reading of Ψ Pusey Barrett and Rudolph’s realism about the quantum state. By discussing the articulation of these four positions, and their interrelation, we conclude that instrumentalism about Ψ is by itself not sufficient to choose one over the other interpretations of quantum mechanics, thereby confirming in a different way the indetermination of the metaphysical interpretations of quantum mechanics. Key words:
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DORRAI
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-01-22
Latest version: 2 (2014-01-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Scientific Image.Van Fraassen, Bas C.
Time and Chance.Albert, David
The Ontology of Bohmian Mechanics.Esfeld, M.; Lazarovici, D.; Hubert, Mario & Durr, D.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-22

Total views
213 ( #16,644 of 43,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #15,682 of 43,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.