Abstract
In recent decades, investigation of brain injuries associated with amnesia
allowed progress in the philosophy and science of memory, but it also paved
the way for the hubris of assuming that memory is an exclusively neural
phenomenon. Nonetheless, there are methodological and conceptual reasons
preventing a reduction of the ecological and contextual phenomenon of
memory to a neural phenomenon, since memory is the observed action of an
individual before being the simple output of a brain (or, at least, so we will argue), and there is no good reason to suppose that it is necessary to postulate a more basic reality to memory lying behind the mere individual actions.