Aggregation, Beneficence, and Chance

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is plausible to think that it is wrong to cure many people’s headaches rather than save someone else’s life. On the other hand, it is plausible to think that it is not wrong to expose someone to a tiny risk of death when curing this person’s headache. I will argue that these claims are inconsistent. For if we keep taking this tiny risk then it is likely that one person dies, while many others’ headaches are cured. In light of this inconsistency, there is a conflict in our intuitions about beneficence and chance. This conflict is perplexing. And I have not been able to find a satisfactory way of resolving it. Perhaps you can do better?
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
197 ( #25,447 of 55,807 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #30,739 of 55,807 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.