Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Would compulsory treatment or vaccination for Covid-19 be justified? In England, there would be significant legal barriers to it. However, we offer a conditional ethical argument in favour of allowing compulsory treatment and vaccination, drawing on an ethical comparison with external constraints—such as quarantine, isolation and ‘lockdown’—that have already been authorised to control the pandemic. We argue that, if the permissive English approach to external constraints for Covid-19 has been justified, then there is a case for a similarly permissive approach to compulsory medical interventions.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2020
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUCMI
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-07-19
Latest version: 1 (2020-08-27)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-07-19

Total views
278 ( #21,954 of 2,439,670 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #27,023 of 2,439,670 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.