Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics. In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUNNA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Censure and Sanctions.Von Hirsch, Andrew

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Self-Control in Responsibility Enhancement and Criminal Rehabilitation.Koi, Polaris; Uusitalo, Susanne & Tuominen, Jarno

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-08-24

Total views
101 ( #32,971 of 50,070 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #34,351 of 50,070 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.