Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn
Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118 (2016)
Abstract
In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics. In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.Author's Profile
Reprint years
2019
DOI
10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-08-24
Downloads
178 (#44,048)
6 months
44 (#29,645)
2016-08-24
Downloads
178 (#44,048)
6 months
44 (#29,645)
Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?
