Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics. In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.

Author's Profile

Thomas Douglas
Oxford University

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-24

Downloads
178 (#44,048)

6 months
44 (#29,645)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?