Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

Neuroethics 12 (1):107-118 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics. In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUNNA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2016-08-24

Total views
131 ( #36,566 of 2,432,437 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #46,174 of 2,432,437 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.