Responsibility-Sensitive Healthcare Funding: Three Responses to Clavien and Hurst’s Critique

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (29):192-195 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Christine Clavien and Samia Hurst (henceforth C-H) make at least three valuable contributions to the literature on responsibility and healthcare. They offer an admirably clear and workable set of criteria for determining a patient's degree of responsibility for her health condition; they deploy those criteria to cast doubt on the view that patients with lifestyle-related conditions are typically significantly responsible for their conditions; and they outline several practical difficulties that would be raised by any attempt to introduce responsibility-sensitive healthcare funding. I am sympathetic to the general thrust of their argument, share—at least tentatively—their policy conclusions, and was persuaded by much of the detail of their argument. However, I do have three critical comments.

Author's Profile

Thomas Douglas
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-02

Downloads
59 (#93,278)

6 months
153 (#24,174)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?