Sex, Lies, and Consent
Ethics 123 (4):717-744 (2013)
Abstract
How wrong is it to deceive someone into sex by lying, say, about one's profession? The answer is seriously wrong when the liar's actual profession would be a deal breaker for the victim of the deception: this deception vitiates the victim's sexual consent, and it is seriously wrong to have sex with someone while lacking his or her consent.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
DOI
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUSLA-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-12-08
View upload history
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Law and Ethics of Virtual Sexual Assault.John Danaher - forthcoming - In Enter Author Name Without Selecting A. Profile: Woodrow Barfield & Enter Author Name Without Selecting A. Profile: Marc Blitz (eds.), The Law of Virtual and Augmented Reality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Press.
Lies, Control, and Consent: A Response to Dougherty and Manson.Danielle Bromwich & Joseph Millum - 2018 - Ethics 128 (2):446-461.
Could There Ever Be an App for That? Consent Apps and the Problem of Sexual Assault.Danaher John - 2018 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 12 (1):143-165.
Social Autonomy and Family-Based Informed Consent.Taylor, James Stacey
Deception and Consent.Dougherty, Tom
View all 14 citations / Add more citations
Added to PP index
2013-11-20
Total views
11,498 ( #66 of 43,848 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
797 ( #289 of 43,848 )
2013-11-20
Total views
11,498 ( #66 of 43,848 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
797 ( #289 of 43,848 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.
