State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is considerable disagreement about the epistemic value of novel predictive success, i.e. when a scientist predicts an unexpected phenomenon, experiments are conducted, and the prediction proves to be accurate. We survey the field on this question, noting both fully articulated views such as weak and strong predictivism, and more nascent views, such as pluralist reasons for the instrumental value of prediction. By examining the various reasons offered for the value of prediction across a range of inferential contexts , we can see that neither weak nor strong predictivism captures all of the reasons for valuing prediction available. A third path is presented, Pluralist Instrumental Predictivism; PIP for short
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Saving the Phenomena.Bogen, James & Woodward, James

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
130 ( #28,187 of 48,820 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #26,394 of 48,820 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.