State of the Field: Why novel prediction matters

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
There is considerable disagreement about the epistemic value of novel predictive success, i.e. when a scientist predicts an unexpected phenomenon, experiments are conducted, and the prediction proves to be accurate. We survey the field on this question, noting both fully articulated views such as weak and strong predictivism, and more nascent views, such as pluralist reasons for the instrumental value of prediction. By examining the various reasons offered for the value of prediction across a range of inferential contexts , we can see that neither weak nor strong predictivism captures all of the reasons for valuing prediction available. A third path is presented, Pluralist Instrumental Predictivism; PIP for short
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUSOT
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Saving the Phenomena.Bogen, James & Woodward, James

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-23

Total views
74 ( #26,735 of 39,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #23,696 of 39,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.