The Burdens of Morality: Why Act‐Consequentialism Demands Too Little

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A classic objection to act-consequentialism is that it is overdemanding: it requires agents to bear too many costs for the sake of promoting the impersonal good. I develop the complementary objection that act-consequentialism is underdemanding: it fails to acknowledge that agents have moral reasons to bear certain costs themselves, even when it would be impersonally better for others to bear these costs.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DOUTBO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-04-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-12-29

Total views
153 ( #32,190 of 58,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #48,416 of 58,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.