Ideality and Cognitive Development: Further Comments on Azeri’s “The Match of Ideals”

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Siyaves Azeri (2020) quite well shows that arithmetical thinking emerges on the basis of specific social practices and material engagement (clay tokens for economic exchange practices beget number concepts, e.g.). But his discussion here is relegated mostly to Neolithic and Bronze Age practices. While surely such practices produced revolutions in the cognitive abilities of many humans, much of the cognitive architecture that allows normative conceptual thought was already in place long before this time. This response, then, is an attempt to sketch the deep prehistory of human cognition in order to show the inter-social bases of normative thought in general. To do this, I will look first to the work of Vygotsky and Leontiev, two often neglected psychologists whose combined efforts culminate in a developmental account of human cognitive origins. Then, I will review some key insights from the contemporary comparative psychologist Michael Tomasello—whose project is admittedly a Vygotskian one—in order to further shed light on the social-practical basis of abstract thought, of which mathematical cognition is surely a part
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DRAIAC
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-12-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-12-02

Total views
71 ( #51,316 of 64,104 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #29,335 of 64,104 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.