Feminism Against Crime Control: On Sexual Subordination and State Apologism

Historical Materialism 26 (2):123-148 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Its critics call it ‘feminism-as-crime-control’, or ‘Governance Feminism’, diagnosing it as a pernicious form of identity politics. Its advocates call it taking sexual violence seriously – by which they mean wielding the power of the state to ‘punish perpetrators’ and ‘protect vulnerable women’. Both sides agree that this approach follows from the radical feminist analysis of sexual violence most strikingly formulated by Catharine MacKinnon. The aim of this paper is to rethink the Governance Feminism debate by questioning this common presupposition. I ask whether taking MacKinnon’s analysis of sexual violence seriously might, in fact, itself give us reason to be critical of political strategies that embrace the punitive state. By raising this question, I hope to persuade radical feminists to listen to critics of carceral politics rather than dismissing them as rape apologists, and critics of carceral politics to listen to radical feminists rather than dismissing them as state apologists.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-08-06
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
White Ignorance.Mills, Charles

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
51 ( #32,925 of 41,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #28,490 of 41,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.