How is Neuroscience Possible?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper, I argue that neuroscience not only is not complemented, but rather is positively undermined, by the substantive commitments of materialist philosophers of mind. Thus, we can have neuroscience or "neurophilosophy" but not both. Since neuroscience is a real science, to the extent that it is in tension with materialistic neurophilosophy, the latter should be abandoned and the former retained.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-06-08
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
164 ( #34,303 of 2,448,218 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #40,220 of 2,448,218 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.