Is Grounding a Hyperintensional Phenomenon?

Analytic Philosophy 58 (4):297-329 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
It is widely thought that grounding is a hyperintensional phenomenon. Unfortunately, the term ‘hyperintensionality’ has been doing double-duty, picking out two distinct phenomena. This paper clears up this conceptual confusion. We call the two resulting notions hyperintensionalityGRND and hyperintensionalityTRAD. While it is clear that grounding is hyperintensionalGRND, the interesting question is whether it is hyperintensionalTRAD. We argue that given well-accepted constraints on the logical form of grounding, to wit, that grounding is irreflexive and asymmetric, grounding is hyperintensionalTRAD only if one endorses a sentential operator view of grounding. We argue that proponents of the sentential operator view will need to distinguish two importantly different kinds of hyperintensionalityTRAD—weak and strong—and we offer them a way to do so.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-29
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Against Grounding Necessitarianism.Alexander Skiles - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (4):717-751.
On What Grounds What.Schaffer, Jonathan
Grounding and Necessity.Leuenberger, Stephan

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
222 ( #12,101 of 38,038 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #10,907 of 38,038 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.