Propositions are not Simple

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some philosophers claim that propositions are simpleā€”i.e., lack parts. In this paper, I argue that this claim is mistaken. I start with the widely accepted claim that propositions are the objects of beliefs. Then I argue that the objects of beliefs have parts. Thus, I conclude that propositions are not simple. My argument for the claim that the objects of beliefs have parts derives from the fact that beliefs are productive and systematic. This fact lurks in the background of debates about the metaphysics of propositions. But its import for these debates has yet to be fully appreciated. So here I bring the point to the fore, and thus make manifest a powerful argument against simple propositions.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DUNPAN
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-11-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-05

Total views
155 ( #42,383 of 71,190 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #26,981 of 71,190 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.