Animal Rights and the Duty to Harm: When to be a Harm Causing Deontologist

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An adequate theory of rights ought to forbid the harming of animals (human or nonhuman) to promote trivial interests of humans, as is often done in the animal-user industries. But what should the rights view say about situations in which harming some animals is necessary to prevent intolerable injustices to other animals? I develop an account of respectful treatment on which, under certain conditions, it’s justified to intentionally harm some individuals to prevent serious harm to others. This can be compatible with recognizing the inherent value of the ones who are harmed. My theory has important implications for contemporary moral issues in nonhuman animal ethics, such as the development of cultured meat and animal research.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EABARA
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-02-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-02-14

Total views
76 ( #37,789 of 51,603 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #6,543 of 51,603 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.