Twenty-one arguments against propensity analyses of probability

Erkenntnis 60 (3):371–416 (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that any broadly dispositional analysis of probability will either fail to give an adequate explication of probability, or else will fail to provide an explication that can be gainfully employed elsewhere (for instance, in empirical science or in the regulation of credence). The diversity and number of arguments suggests that there is little prospect of any successful analysis along these lines.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-11-26
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
834 ( #5,927 of 2,445,415 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #11,558 of 2,445,415 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.