‘Legitimate rape’, moral coherence, and degrees of sexual harm

Think 14 (41):9-20 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In 2012, the politician Todd Akin caused a firestorm by suggesting, in the context of an argument about the moral permissibility of abortion, that some forms of rape were. This seemed to imply that other forms of rape must not be legitimate. In response, several commentators pointed out that rape is a and that there are. While the intention of these commentators was clear, I argue that they may have played into the very stereotype of rape endorsed by Akin. Such a response, I claim, actually obscures a range of sexual harms, including some that may not rise to the level of being a crime. I also offer some thoughts on the moral psychology behind anti-abortion arguments of the kind advanced by Akin

Author's Profile

Brian D. Earp
University of Oxford

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-14

Downloads
764 (#17,330)

6 months
116 (#27,072)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?