‘Legitimate rape’, moral coherence, and degrees of sexual harm

Think 14 (41):9-20 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In 2012, the politician Todd Akin caused a firestorm by suggesting, in the context of an argument about the moral permissibility of abortion, that some forms of rape were. This seemed to imply that other forms of rape must not be legitimate. In response, several commentators pointed out that rape is a and that there are. While the intention of these commentators was clear, I argue that they may have played into the very stereotype of rape endorsed by Akin. Such a response, I claim, actually obscures a range of sexual harms, including some that may not rise to the level of being a crime. I also offer some thoughts on the moral psychology behind anti-abortion arguments of the kind advanced by Akin
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EARLRM
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-02-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-09-14

Total views
319 ( #14,327 of 51,477 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #10,445 of 51,477 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.