Aristotelian Accidents

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue, firstly, that the accounts of 'accident' in Aristotle's Met. V 30 and in Top. I 5 cannot be used to elucidate each other: the Metaphysics passage tries to disentangle the uses of a Greek word, the Topics passage introduces technical terms for Aristotle's semantics. I then argue that the positive definition in Top. I 5 is to be understood in the following way: X is an accident of Y iff X belongs to Y and if there is a Z such that X can belong to Z and also not belong to Z. Thus, being white is an accident of snow. I finally argue that certain shortcomings in the Topics account lead Aristotle to redefine accident in the Posterior Analytics.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EBEAA
Revision history
First archival date: 2020-01-06
Latest version: 2 (2020-01-07)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Ontological Underpinnings of Aristotle's Philosophy of Science.Breno A. Zuppolini - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Campinas, Brazil

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-01-20

Total views
39 ( #42,272 of 47,280 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #21,237 of 47,280 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.