Parthood and naturalness

Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3163-3180 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Is part of a perfectly natural, or fundamental, relation? Philosophers have been hesitant to take a stand on this issue. One reason for this hesitancy is the worry that, if parthood is perfectly natural, then the perfectly natural properties and relations are not suitably “independent” of one another. In this paper, I argue that parthood is a perfectly natural relation. In so doing, I argue that this “independence” worry is unfounded. I conclude by noting some consequences of the naturalness of parthood.

Author's Profile

Maya Eddon
University of Massachusetts, Amherst


Added to PP

232 (#34,948)

6 months
34 (#30,729)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?