Astrology, Fate and Causation

Philosophical Pathways (200) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Some philosophers assert that astrology is a false theory. The simplest way to argue against all astrology is to identify a proposition that any kind of astrology must be committed to and then show that this proposition is false. In this paper I draw attention to some misconceptions about which propositions are essential to astrology.

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-25

Downloads
1,269 (#11,695)

6 months
178 (#17,831)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?