A flawed argument reconstruction in political philosophy

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There are some premise-by-premise reconstructions in political philosophy which are flawed, because they omit at least one premise or misword at least one premise. This paper focuses on a reconstruction by Richard Child. The original argument is by Andrea Sangiovanni and is about whether egalitarian values of distributive justice apply both within a state and globally. Child’s reconstruction has been reproduced in a paper by Ian Davis, who approves of it. But I point out five logical problems with the reconstruction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-08-26
Latest version: 9 (2020-10-24)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #35,930 of 54,349 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #42,433 of 54,349 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.