Can Raz consistently suppose that fundamental moral principles are satiable?

Abstract

Joseph Raz claims that the fundamental principles of morality and politics are satiable: there is a point at which one has fulfilled them. I argue that Raz cannot consistently endorse this claim, given his approach to saving lives.

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-02

Downloads
195 (#84,776)

6 months
87 (#63,198)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?