Has everything on Adam Smith been written? A model and a counterargument

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I respond to Nuno Palma’s suggestion, made in 2008, that we are approaching the day in which nothing new can be said about Adam Smith. I think that is unlikely. The paper presents a model to support the suggestion. To illustrate my counterargument, I focus on the problem of Adam Smith’s apparently contradictory claims about the effects of the division of labour on character.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EDWHEO
Upload history
First archival date: 2022-06-22
Latest version: 3 (2022-06-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-06-22

Total views
18 ( #69,887 of 70,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #42,994 of 70,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.