Has everything on Adam Smith been written? A model and a counterargument


I respond to Nuno Palma’s suggestion, made in 2008, that we are approaching the day in which nothing new can be said about Adam Smith. I think that is unlikely. The paper presents a model to support the suggestion. To illustrate my counterargument, I focus on the problem of Adam Smith’s apparently contradictory claims about the effects of the division of labour on character.

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)


Added to PP

138 (#68,718)

6 months
61 (#49,394)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?