J. S. Mill and Robert Veatch’s Critique of Utilitarianism

Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):181-200 (1985)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Modern bioethics is clearly dominated by deontologists who believe that we have some way of identifying morally correct and incorrect acts or rules besides taking account of their consequences. Robert M. Veatch is one of the most outspoken of those numerous modern medical ethicists who agree in rejecting all forms of teleological, utilitarian, or consequentialist ethical theories. This paper examines his critique of utilitarianism and shows that the utilitarianism of John Stuart Mill is either not touched at all by his critique or can be defended against it. This article argues that the dominant deontological majority is mistaken and that a utilitarian theory of moral action very much like Mill’s is precisely what is needed by modern medical ethics and by those medical practitioners who are resolved to practice medicine in a reasonable and morally acceptable manner.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
0038-4283
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EDWJSM-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-01-29
Latest version: 1 (2019-01-29)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2010-09-15

Total views
229 ( #21,053 of 53,612 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #23,853 of 53,612 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.