Public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women

Advances in Bioethics 2:303 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This article tries to show that commonplace economic, ethico-religious, anti-racist,and logical-consistency objections to public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women are quite weak. By contrast, arguments appealing to basic human rights to freedom of speech, informed consent, protection from great harm, justice and equal protection under the law, strongly support public funding. Thus, refusing to provide abortions at public expense for women who cannot afford them is morally unacceptable and rationally unjustifiable, despite the opinions of former Presidents Reagan and Bush, the more conservative members of the Supreme Court of the United States, the current Congress, and the majority of the American people.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-03-18
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #42,547 of 2,410,329 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #56,125 of 2,410,329 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.