"John Wesley's Non-Literal Literalism and Hermeneutics of Love"

Wesleyan Theological Journal 51 (2):26-40 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A thorough examination of John Wesley’s writings will show that he was not a biblical literalist or infallibilist, despite his own occasional suggestions to the contrary. His most important principles for interpreting the Bible were: We should take its words literally only if doing so is not absurd, in which case we should “look for a looser meaning;” and “No Scripture can mean that God is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works.” Eleven instances of his not taking biblical texts literally are examined. His real view was something like this: Biblical language is infallibly and literally true if and only if it does not contradict more basic scriptures and is not absurd, that is, not construed literally when metaphorical, or not misleadingly metaphorical, or not oversimplified or exaggerated, or not culture bound, or not contrary to reason and experience, or not ethically unconscionable and unloving.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EDWQWN
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-04-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-04-24

Total views
887 ( #4,146 of 54,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
167 ( #2,710 of 54,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.