Rawls versus utilitarianism: the subset objection

E-Logos Electronic Journal for Philosophy 23 (2):37-41 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper presents an objection to John Rawls’s use of the original position method to argue against implementing utilitarian rules. The use of this method is pointless because a small subset of the premises Rawls relies on can be used to infer the same conclusion.

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)


Added to PP

948 (#11,857)

6 months
157 (#15,289)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?