Practical Equilibrium: A Way of Deciding What to Think about Morality

Mind 119 (475):549-584 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Practical equilibrium, like reflective equilibrium, is a way of deciding what to think about morality. It shares with reflective equilibrium the general thesis that there is some way in which a moral theory must, in order to be acceptable, answer to one’s moral intuitions, but it differs from reflective equilibrium in its specification of exactly how a moral theory must answer to one’s intuitions. Whereas reflective equilibrium focuses on a theory’s consistency with those intuitions, practical equilibrium also gives weight to a theory’s approval of one’s having those intuitions
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-06-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modern Moral Philosophy.Anscombe, G. E. M.
The Right and the Good.Ross, W. D. & Joseph, H. W. B.
Morals by Agreement.Gauthier, David

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
189 ( #18,357 of 43,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,612 of 43,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.